suitelasas.blogg.se

Vikram aur betaal part 21
Vikram aur betaal part 21







vikram aur betaal part 21

What followed was a 50-year-long dispute, carried on by Biswas and subsequently by his legal heirs for a stay on this sale, spanning civil courts, the Patna High Court and eventually the Supreme Court.Īt the hearing Tuesday, the SC bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and V. Four years later, the plot was put up for auction and two brothers, Sachindra Nath Mukherjee and Dulal Kanti Mukherjee bid the highest on it, offering Rs 5,500 for the land. A sale proclamation was then issued in July 1975, which was challenged by Biswas on the ground of material irregularity and fraud.īiswas’ challenge to the sales proclamation of his property was dismissed in September 1975. ft, equivalent to the amount she was owed. However, he was unable to pay it back and Devi filed a petition for the execution of the order, asking for an attachment of Biswas’ property measuring 7,450 sq.

vikram aur betaal part 21

She won the suit in 1974, and Biswas was asked to pay the amount back in six installments. The dispute began in 1971 when a woman named Rama Ravi Devi from West Bengal’s Bongaon district filed a civil suit in a munsif court against Sasadhar Biswas for the recovery of Rs 3,000. New Delhi: A 50-year-old dispute involving the execution of a civil suit for the recovery of Rs 3,000 finally came to an end Tuesday after five rounds of litigation, with the Supreme Court rejecting the petition that sought to prevent the recovery.









Vikram aur betaal part 21